ISO 2081 Designation | Metallic and other inorganic coatings — Electroplated coatings of zinc with supplementary treatments on iron or steel

ISO 2081 Designation Codes

CodeDesignationDescription
ZnZinc CoatingPure zinc coating applied for basic corrosion resistance on iron or steel.
ATransparent Conversion CoatingTransparent chromate layer to enhance corrosion resistance.
BYellow Chromate ConversionYellow chromate layer for improved corrosion protection.
DBlue Chromate ConversionBlue chromate layer that provides moderate corrosion resistance and a decorative finish.
CClear Chromate ConversionColorless chromate layer for basic corrosion resistance.
SR(x)≥yStress Relief (SR)Pre-electroplating heat treatment to relieve stress; x = temperature, y = hours.
ER(x)yEmbrittlement Relief (ER)Post-electroplating heat treatment to reduce hydrogen embrittlement; x = temperature, y = hours.
T1, T2, T3Sealant Types (T1, T2, T3)Organic or inorganic sealants applied for additional corrosion protection.
ISO 2081 Designation Codes | Metallic and other inorganic coatings — Electroplated coatings of zinc with supplementary treatments on iron or steel

ISO 2081 Examples

Example 1: Designation of an electrodeposited coating of 15 μm zinc (Zn15) on iron or steel (Fe) with a yellow chromate conversion coating (B) applied:

  • Designation: Electrodeposited coating ISO 2081 – Fe/Zn15/B

Example 2: Designation of an electrodeposited coating of 10 μm zinc (Zn10) on iron or steel (Fe), with stress relief heat treatment prior to electroplating at 250 °C for a minimum of 3 h, designated as SR(250)≥3, and post-electroplating hydrogen embrittlement relief heat treatment at 200 °C for 10 h, designated as ER(200)10. The coating has a blue chromate finish (D) and an organic sealant (T3):

  • Designation: Electrodeposited coating ISO 2081 – Fe/SR(250)≥3/Zn10/ER(200)10/D/T3
Modulus Metal Turkey Steel Electroplating Process

ISO 19598 Designation | Metallic coatings — Electroplated coatings of zinc and zinc alloys on iron or steel with supplementary Cr(VI)-free treatment

ISO 19598 Designation Codes

CodeDesignationDescription
ZnZinc CoatingPure zinc coating used for general corrosion resistance on steel.
ZnNiZinc-Nickel Alloy CoatingZinc-nickel alloy, offering high corrosion protection, especially in harsh environments.
ZnFeZinc-Iron Alloy CoatingZinc-iron alloy coating suitable for applications needing both wear and corrosion resistance.
CnIridescent PassivationIridescent passivation layer with a rainbow-like appearance, for enhanced corrosion protection.
BnYellow PassivationYellow passivation layer that adds significant corrosion resistance.
FnBlack PassivationBlack passivation layer for a dark finish and improved corrosion resistance.
DnBlue PassivationBlue passivation for moderate corrosion resistance and a blue-tinted appearance.
T0No SealantNo sealing treatment applied after passivation.
T1, T2Sealant Types (T1, T2)Organic or inorganic sealants for additional corrosion resistance; T1 and T2 specify types.
TxCoater’s Choice SealantSealant application is left to the coater’s discretion based on requirements.

ISO 19598 Examples

Example 1: Designation of a zinc-nickel (ZnNi) alloy coating on a steel (Fe) component with a minimum coating thickness of 10 μm (10) and blue passivation (Dn):

  • Designation: Electroplated coating ISO 19598 – Fe//ZnNi10//Dn//T0

Example 2: Designation of a zinc-iron (ZnFe) alloy coating on a steel (Fe) component with a minimum coating thickness of 8 μm (8), yellow passivation (Bn), and a sealing treatment (T1):

  • Designation: Electroplated coating ISO 19598 – Fe//ZnFe8//Bn//T1

Example 3: Designation of a zinc coating on a steel (Fe) component with a minimum coating thickness of 20 μm (20) and iridescent passivation (Cn). The subsequent sealant application is left to the coater’s choice:

  • Designation: Electroplated coating ISO 19598 – Fe//Zn20//Cn//Tx
Modulus Metal Turkey Steel Electroplating Process Yellow Chromating Türkiye

ISO 2081 vs. ISO 19598

ISO 2081 and ISO 19598 are both standards related to electroplating, but they serve different purposes and apply to different types of coatings and applications. Here’s a comparison of these standards:

Certainly! Here’s a comparison table for ISO 2081 vs. ISO 19598:

CriteriaISO 2081ISO 19598
TitleMetallic Coatings — Electroplated Coatings of Zinc on Iron or SteelMetallic and Other Inorganic Coatings — Electroplated Coatings of Zinc Alloys
Coating TypePure zinc coatingsZinc-alloy coatings (e.g., zinc-nickel, zinc-iron)
PurposeBasic corrosion resistance and appearance enhancement for iron and steelHigher corrosion resistance for components in harsh environments
Corrosion ResistanceModerateHigher, especially in salt spray and high-temperature conditions
Post-Treatment OptionsChromate conversion coatings for added corrosion protectionPassivation and additional treatments to improve durability and corrosion resistance
Typical ApplicationsIndustrial, construction, and general hardwareAutomotive, aerospace, and electronics demanding high corrosion resistance
Thickness RequirementsDefined based on environmental exposure levelsDefined based on alloy type and intended environmental performance
Adhesion RequirementsSpecifiedSpecified, with emphasis on high adherence for zinc-alloy coatings
Appearance OptionsBright, matte, and various finishesVarious finishes, depending on alloy and post-treatment processes
Standard ApplicabilityCommonly used for components that require moderate protection (e.g., fasteners, tools)Applied where superior corrosion protection is critical (e.g., automotive parts, aerospace)
ISO 2081 vs. ISO 19598

ISO 2081: Metallic Coatings — Electroplated Coatings of Zinc on Iron or Steel

  • Focus: This standard specifies requirements for electroplated zinc coatings on iron and steel.
  • Purpose: Primarily used to enhance corrosion resistance and provide aesthetic finishes to iron and steel products. Zinc plating is commonly used in automotive, industrial, and construction applications.
  • Specifications:
  • It defines various coating types based on thickness, corrosion resistance, and appearance (such as bright or matte finishes).
  • Includes guidelines on coating thickness, adhesion, and corrosion resistance for different environmental conditions.
  • Details post-treatment options, such as chromate conversion coatings, to further enhance corrosion resistance.
  • Applications: Typically applied to components where moderate corrosion protection is needed, including fasteners, automotive parts, and hardware.

ISO 19598: Metallic and Other Inorganic Coatings — Electroplated Coatings of Zinc Alloys with Nickel, Iron, or Other Elements

  • Focus: Specifies requirements for electroplated coatings of zinc alloys, including zinc-nickel, zinc-iron, and other zinc-based alloys.
  • Purpose: Used to provide higher corrosion resistance than pure zinc coatings, especially for components exposed to harsher environments.
  • Specifications:
  • Defines different coating compositions, such as zinc-nickel or zinc-iron, and their respective corrosion resistance properties.
  • Addresses requirements for thickness, adhesion, and corrosion resistance similar to ISO 2081 but emphasizes zinc-alloy compositions.
  • Also includes guidelines for post-treatments and passivation processes to enhance durability.
  • Applications: More suited for parts that demand higher corrosion resistance, such as components in automotive, aerospace, and electronics industries. Zinc-nickel alloy coatings, in particular, are widely used for automotive applications due to their excellent corrosion resistance in salt spray and high-temperature environments.

Key Differences

  • Coating Type: ISO 2081 focuses on pure zinc coatings, while ISO 19598 covers zinc-alloy coatings (e.g., zinc-nickel, zinc-iron).
  • Corrosion Resistance: Zinc-alloy coatings specified in ISO 19598 typically provide better corrosion resistance, especially in harsh conditions.
  • Application Suitability: ISO 2081 is generally suitable for standard industrial applications, while ISO 19598 is often chosen for high-demand applications like automotive and aerospace, where enhanced protection is essential.

In summary, ISO 2081 is best for basic corrosion protection with zinc coatings, while ISO 19598 is geared towards applications requiring more advanced corrosion protection using zinc-alloy coatings.

Modulus-Metal-Turkey-Steel-Electroplating-Process-Turkiye

AISI 301 VS 302 VS 303 VS 304 VS 304L VS 310 VS 316 VS 316L

PropertyAISI 301AISI 302AISI 303AISI 304AISI 304LAISI 310AISI 316AISI 316L
Chemical Composition
Chromium (Cr)16-18%17-19%17-19%18-20%18-20%24-26%16-18%16-18%
Nickel (Ni)6-8%8-10%8-10%8-10.5%8-12%19-22%10-14%10-14%
Molybdenum (Mo)NoneNoneNoneNoneNoneNone2-3%2-3%
Carbon (C)≤ 0.15%≤ 0.15%≤ 0.15%≤ 0.08%≤ 0.03%≤ 0.25%≤ 0.08%≤ 0.03%
Manganese (Mn)≤ 2%≤ 2%≤ 2%≤ 2%≤ 2%≤ 2%≤ 2%≤ 2%
Silicon (Si)≤ 1%≤ 1%≤ 1%≤ 1%≤ 1%≤ 1.5%≤ 1%≤ 1%
Sulfur (S)≤ 0.03%≤ 0.03%0.15-0.35%≤ 0.03%≤ 0.03%≤ 0.03%≤ 0.03%≤ 0.03%
Phosphorus (P)≤ 0.045%≤ 0.045%≤ 0.20%≤ 0.045%≤ 0.045%≤ 0.045%≤ 0.045%≤ 0.045%
Mechanical Properties
Tensile Strength930 MPa (cold-rolled)620 MPa515 MPa515 MPa485 MPa520 MPa515 MPa485 MPa
Yield Strength370 MPa (cold-rolled)275 MPa205 MPa205 MPa170 MPa215 MPa205 MPa170 MPa
Elongation40%40%35%40%40%40%40%40%
Hardness (Brinell)270 HB (cold-rolled)201 HB190 HB201 HB183 HB217 HB201 HB183 HB
Corrosion ResistanceModerate, vulnerable to stress crackingGood in mild atmospheresModerate due to sulfurExcellent in most environmentsSlightly lower than 304 (due to low C)Excellent, especially at high temperaturesSuperior due to molybdenum, good in marine environmentsSuperior, especially for chloride and marine applications
WeldabilityGood, but prone to sensitizationExcellentFair, sulfur affects weldabilityExcellentExcellent (low carbon avoids carbide precipitation)Fair, requires heat treatmentExcellent, with resistance to sensitizationExcellent (low carbon avoids sensitization)
FormabilityExcellent (in cold-rolled form)ExcellentGood, less formable than 304ExcellentExcellentFair, less formable than 304GoodGood
Heat ResistanceModerate, up to 870°CModerateModerateModerate, up to 870°CModerateExcellent, up to 1100°CGood, up to 870°CGood, up to 870°C
MagnetismSlightly magnetic (after cold working)Non-magnetic in annealed conditionSlightly magnetic after machiningNon-magnetic in annealed conditionNon-magneticNon-magneticNon-magneticNon-magnetic
Typical ApplicationsSprings, automotive componentsFood processing equipmentMachined parts, fasteners, valvesKitchen equipment, appliances, constructionChemical containers, low-temp equipmentFurnace parts, heat exchangers, turbinesMarine environments, chemical processingMarine applications, medical devices
Cost (Price)$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

Explanation of Costs:

  • $ = Lower cost (more economical)
  • $$ = Medium cost
  • $$$ = Higher cost
  • $$$$ = Significantly higher cost

Cost Insights:

  1. AISI 301 and 302: These are relatively affordable options, priced similarly to AISI 304 but with some trade-offs in terms of corrosion resistance and formability. Suitable for non-critical applications where cost savings are important.
  2. AISI 303: Higher in price due to the addition of sulfur for enhanced machinability, making it more expensive than AISI 304 but ideal for high-volume machining jobs.
  3. AISI 304 and 304L: These are the most commonly used stainless steels, making them mid-priced. AISI 304L offers similar performance with better weldability, so their prices are close.
  4. AISI 310: One of the most expensive stainless steel grades due to its high chromium and nickel content, providing superior heat and oxidation resistance. It’s often used in high-temperature applications, which justify its higher cost.
  5. AISI 316 and 316L: These grades are priced higher than AISI 304 due to their molybdenum content, which enhances corrosion resistance, especially in marine and chloride environments. AISI 316L, with lower carbon content, is slightly more expensive than 316, particularly in applications requiring enhanced weldability and resistance to sensitization.

Conclusion:

  • 301, 302, and 304(L) are the more economical choices for general-purpose applications.
  • 303 is more expensive due to machinability enhancements.
  • 310 and 316(L) are higher-priced options due to their specialized corrosion and heat-resistant properties, making them suitable for harsh environments.

Modulus Metal | Sand Casting | Investment Casting | Foundry | CNC Machining | Press Bending | Plastics Injection Molding | Laser Cutting | Welding | Products | Supplier Manufacturer Company | Manufacturer | Service Provider | Exporter | Modulus Metal in TURKEY | Türkiye

AISI 301 VS 302 VS 303 VS 304 VS 304L VS 310 VS 316 VS 316L Modulus Metal Turkey

Investment Casting vs. Lost Foam Casting Comparison Table

Investment Casting vs. Lost Foam Casting Modulus Metal Turkey Türkiye 02

Detailed Investment Casting vs. Lost Foam Casting Comparison Table

CriteriaInvestment CastingLost Foam Casting
Process OverviewCreates a wax pattern, coats it in ceramic, melts out the wax, and pours molten metal into the cavity.Uses a foam pattern embedded in sand. When metal is poured, the foam vaporizes, leaving the casting.
Applicable StandardsASTM A356, ASTM E931, ISO 8062-3, and DIN EN 12890 for process quality and tolerances.ASTM A995, ISO 8502, ISO 8062-3, and VDG P690 for process quality, tolerances, and materials.
Tolerances±0.1 mm to ±0.5 mm depending on the part size and complexity. Typical tolerance grades: CT4 to CT6 (ISO 8062-3).±0.3 mm to ±1.0 mm based on part dimensions. Tolerance grades: CT8 to CT12 (ISO 8062-3).
Surface Finish1.6-3.2 µm Ra (fine surface finish with minimal post-processing).6.3-12.5 µm Ra (requires secondary operations for fine finish).
Material GradesFerrous: Stainless steel (e.g., 304, 316), carbon steel (e.g., AISI 1018, AISI 1045).
Non-Ferrous: Aluminum alloys (e.g., A356), brass, bronze.
Ferrous: Gray iron (EN-GJL-250), ductile iron (EN-GJS-400-15, EN-GJS-500-7).
Non-Ferrous: Aluminum alloys (e.g., AlSi12), magnesium alloys.
Size & Dimension LimitsSmall to medium-sized parts with dimensions typically ranging from a few millimeters to 1 meter. Maximum weight: up to 500 kg.Suitable for medium to large castings. Maximum part size can reach 2 meters or more. Maximum weight: up to 5000 kg.
Wall ThicknessCapable of producing parts with wall thickness as low as 0.5 mm.Minimum wall thickness: 2-3 mm due to process constraints.
Dimensional AccuracyHigh accuracy, typically within ±0.1% of part dimensions.Moderate accuracy, typically within ±0.3% of part dimensions.
Mechanical Properties– High tensile strength and good impact resistance, depending on alloy choice.
– Can produce parts with complex stress patterns due to uniform grain structure.
– Suitable for parts with lower tensile strength and ductility.
– Mechanical properties are more dependent on mold conditions and sand compaction.
Complexity & GeometryCapable of producing highly complex geometries with thin walls, undercuts, and intricate details.Good for moderate complexity; limited capability for intricate designs due to mold constraints.
Tooling CostsHigh initial tooling cost for wax and ceramic molds; more economical for high-volume production.Lower initial tooling cost for foam patterns and sand molds; more suitable for small to medium production volumes.
Production Volume SuitabilityIdeal for medium to high-volume production runs. Economical for large batches.Suitable for small to medium production runs. Preferred for prototype and medium series production.
Lead TimeLonger lead time due to mold preparation and multi-step process. Typically 4-8 weeks depending on part complexity.Shorter lead time due to simplified tooling and fewer steps. Typically 2-4 weeks.
Typical ApplicationsAerospace turbine blades, medical implants, automotive turbocharger wheels, and complex machinery components.Automotive engine blocks, pump housings, gear cases, and large, less complex structural parts.
Post-Processing RequirementsMinimal post-processing required. Parts are usually ready for use or only require minor machining.Requires secondary operations like grinding, machining, and heat treatment for surface finish and dimensional accuracy.
Environmental ConsiderationsCeramic molds and wax patterns have higher waste and energy consumption, but the process offers higher precision.Sand molds are recyclable, and the process generates less waste, making it more environmentally friendly.
Overall CostHigher overall cost due to complex molds and tooling. Cost-effective for high precision and complex parts.Lower overall cost due to simplified patterns and mold production. More economical for larger parts and low to medium complexity.
Investment Casting vs. Lost Foam Casting Comparison Table

AISI 204-Cu Stainless steel, Annealed, Austenitic | 1.4597 |  Toughness | Fracture Toughness

AISI 204-Cu Stainless steel-1.4597-X9CrMnCuNB17-8-3, S20430 Fracture Toughness Modulus Metal Turkey Turkiye

Modulus Metal | Manufacturer Company in TURKEY: Sand Casting | Investment Casting | Foundry | CNC Machining | Press Bending | Laser Cutting | Welding | Plastics Injection Molding |Turkiye

Fracture Toughness & ToughnessValues
Fracture toughness*133 – 147 MPa.m^0.5
Toughness (G)*89.9 – 110 kJ/m^2
*Values indicated with asterisks (*) are approximate. No guarantee is provided for the precision of this information.

AISI 204-Cu Stainless steel, Annealed, Austenitic | Mechanical Properties

AISI 204-Cu Stainless steel-1.4597-X9CrMnCuNB17-8-3, S20430 Mechanical Properties Modulus Metal Turkey Turkiye Manufacturing

Modulus Metal | Manufacturer Company in TURKEY: Sand Casting | Investment Casting | Foundry | CNC Machining | Press Bending | Laser Cutting | Welding | Plastics Injection Molding |Turkiye

Mechanical propertiesValues
Young’s modulus* 193 – 201 GPa
Specific stiffness* 24.7 – 25.7 MN.m/kg
Yield strength (elastic limit)324 – 415 MPa
Tensile strength662 – 795 MPa
Specific strength* 41.5 – 53.1 kN.m/kg
Elongation52 – 62 % strain
Compressive strength* 324 – 415 MPa
Flexural modulus* 193 – 201 GPa
Flexural strength (modulus of rupture)* 324 – 415 MPa
Shear modulus75 – 80 GPa
Poisson’s ratio* 0.265 – 0.275
Shape factor   55
Hardness – Vickers* 192 – 230 HV
Hardness – Rockwell B90 – 96 HRB
Hardness – Rockwell C* 9 – 18 HRC
Hardness – Brinell* 185 – 214 HB
Elastic stored energy (springs)* 309 – 511 kJ/m^3
Fatigue strength at 10^7 cycles278 – 308 MPa
Fatigue strength model (stress range)* 243 – 352 MPa
*Values indicated with asterisks (*) are approximate. No guarantee is provided for the precision of this information.

AISI 204-Cu Stainless steel, Annealed, Austenitic | Chemical Composition  

AISI 204-Cu Stainless steel-1.4597-X9CrMnCuNB17-8-3, S20430 Chemical Composition Modulus Metal Turkey Turkiye Manufacturing

Modulus Metal | Manufacturer Company in TURKEY: Sand Casting | Investment Casting | Foundry | CNC Machining | Press Bending | Laser Cutting | Welding | Plastics Injection Molding |Turkiye

Composition detail%
C (carbon) 0 – 0.15 %
Cr (chromium) 15.5 – 17.5 %
Cu (copper) 2 – 4 %
Fe (iron) * 64.5 – 74.4 %
Mn (manganese) 6.5 – 9 %
N (nitrogen) 0.05 – 0.25 %
Ni (nickel) 1.5 – 3.5 %
P (phosphorus) 0 – 0.06 %
S (sulfur) 0 – 0.03 %
Si (silicon) 0 – 1 %
*Values indicated with asterisks (*) are approximate. No guarantee is provided for the precision of this information.